Showing posts with label Usmanov. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Usmanov. Show all posts

Saturday, September 29, 2012

Usmanov – I don’t want a place on the Arsenal Board, I just love the club!

Posted on September 29, 2012 by admin

The second biggest Arsenal shareholder Alisher Usmanov has made an interview which seems to be a peace offering to Stan Kroenke in which he declares that he has never petitioned for a place on the Arsenal Board, but just wants the club to stop selling their best players and so increase their chances of winning a trophy.

This seems to be the only complaint he has about how things are going at the club. Usmanov said: “Nobody can convince fans that the club is doing fine if for the past three or four years the club has been selling its best players.

“It doesn’t matter who our extremely talented coach, Arsene Wenger, buys to plug these holes if we want to win trophies.”

“I’m an absolute fan of Arsene Wenger. I support him and I’m confident in him. We think he’s a hero.

“Despite changes in the playing line-up, he keeps the variations of the same beautiful game.”

Although the letter from Usmanov a while ago seemed to critize Kroenke’s policies, he is now calling for everyone to support the club whatever happens in the future. He said: “Arsenal received our letter. We didn’t mean it as a hostile message or a declaration of war.”

“We are tired of being accused of fighting for a place on the board. We have never in our lives asked for this place.”

“The season is beginning — we must close this discussion and support the club, coach and players.”

“I never say we need to spend enormous money for any players but we must have the capacity.”

But he also reiterated that he would not be selling his shares in the forseeable future either. “If you sell what you love you lose yourself.” he said. “For now, we stay in Arsenal as shareholders as long as we don’t lose our love for this club. Now we wish it support and great victory.”

Especially on a day like this with such an important game ahead of us, everyone on the board, in the stands, and all around the world, just need to get behind Arsene Wenger and whatever Arsenal team he picks as we all pull together for a famous victory…..

SHARE THIS ARTICLE WITH YOUR MATES! Tags: Arsenal board, shareholders, support, Usmanov
Category Arsenal Financial News, Arsenal News, Arsenal opinion
Trackback: trackback from your own site.

COMMENTS GUIDELINES: ANY COMMENTS WITH SWEARING OR PERSONAL ABUSE WILL BE DELETED WITHOUT EXCEPTION: PLEASE DISCUSS THE SUBJECT IN A FRIENDLY AND OBJECTIVE MANNER. SERIAL ABUSERS WILL BE BANNED. PLEASE BE NICE TO YOUR FELLOW GOONERS! NEW IDEA!! If A comment is deemed EXTRA SPECIAL I reserve the right to sopy it and use it as an article in its own right. (Edited of course!)


View More

Thursday, August 9, 2012

Ozzy: Forget Usmanov and Kroenke – Arsenal Fans should pull together!

Posted on August 09, 2012 by admin

Let’s see what happens in the coming months by OzzyAFC

Well so far its been an interesting and somewhat nail biting closed season for Arsenal fans, we’ve done some superb business so far with the acquisition of Podolski, Giroud and most recently Cazorla and we have thus far managed to retain the possible “want outs” in the shape of Walcott and Van Persie. We are still in the chase for Sahin and possibly Wanyamma as well as the tall Korean from Celtic.

All in all it’s looking like an exciting time ahead if you’re of the north London red and white persuasion.

Mean while Alex Ferguson bemoans the fact that we are “not speaking” to him regarding RVP’s transfer to the hated red devils and also about the fact that FIFA appear to be turning a blind eye to PSG’s mammoth spending and therefore flaunting the FFP rules brought in by the illustrious Mr Platini.

Back in our own camp Alisher Usmanov is coming under fire for stating that the board’s current policy will ruin the club as a footballing power and Many Pro board fans are calling him a rapist and a gangster.

Well I’ve always been a pro Usmanov advocate and I have come under a great deal of flack for being so, I’ve been the first to criticise the Boards lack of ambition and the reluctance to spend money however even I have to say that so far I’ve been happy with the business done in the transfer window and also the apparent surge in ambition that has previously not been shown.

I still advocate Usmanov being represented on the board and having a little extra to spend in the transfer market and a little more in the wage structure to retain and buy top class players but as that not going to happen any time soon I have to carry on supporting my club and tentatively backing the moves that they are making.

We are currently in a very good position and if we can retain the services of a certain Dutchman AND players like Wilshere and Rosicky can come back quickly we may just have a good shot at some silverware this season. Its with this in mind that I say Perhaps the expenditure we have made this season will lead us back down the path of glory and we have really gone out of our way as a club to get this business done early and have not held back on the monies which leaves my argument about breaking the boards recent policy about not spending a fair argument.

Perhaps the moaning and protests from the Anti Kroenke Pro Usmanov side has had some impact after all and if this is the case then wont ALL Arsenal fans benefit from this next season?? I think its way past time that we all just got on with it together as the pro Kroenke side have what they want and the pro Usmanov side have a lot to look forward to under the current regime so lets stop the insults and backbiting and pull together as its all to play for in the coming months.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE WITH YOUR MATES! Tags: Kroenke, quality, transfers, Usmanov, Van Persie
Category Arsenal News, Arsenal previews, Arsenal rumours CALLING ALL GOTHS !!!! UNIQUE HAND-MADE GOTH JEWELLERY AT GothicChameleon.com
Trackback: trackback from your own site.

COMMENTS GUIDELINES: ANY COMMENTS WITH SWEARING OR PERSONAL ABUSE WILL BE DELETED WITHOUT EXCEPTION: PLEASE DISCUSS THE SUBJECT IN A FRIENDLY AND OBJECTIVE MANNER. SERIAL ABUSERS WILL BE BANNED. PLEASE BE NICE TO YOUR FELLOW GOONERS! NEW IDEA!! If A comment is deemed EXTRA SPECIAL I reserve the right to sopy it and use it as an article in its own right. (Edited of course!)


View the original article here

Thursday, July 12, 2012

Arsenal Debate: Why Usmanov MUST have a seat on the Board…

Usmanov Debate: Should Red & White holdings be invited onto the Arsenal board? By SC

Arsenal FC is a unique football club. It always has been. All of us want to see our club prosper and remain within the elite rankings of the sport; however, we do to an extent, share different beliefs about the approach the club should take in order to achieve this. There has been huge debate recently about the current management style of the board of directors, and of course, one Alisher Usmanov – the man who thinks he is the answer to all our prayers. Now, before making a decision about what we, the fans, actually want to happen, it is important to look at both sides of the argument.

We are all proud of the consistent performance of the club which has been fuelled by relatively little spending. 15 consecutive years in the Champions League is an achievement in itself and should not be taken for granted. But is this enough for a prestigious club who managed to win the title unbeaten in 38 EPL games? It was that heroic team which won ‘best team’ in BBC’s Premier League: 20 season’s awards. After that, I think we were all hoping that we would go on to our era of domination in the EPL and Europe, but sadly, it was not to be. We moved from Highbury to the Emirates Stadium, which we are still paying for, yet this should not be an excuse for our failure to win a trophy since 2005.

All great teams have great stadiums with a great history, and as of yet, the Emirates has not a single trophy to its name. This has to be put down to our self-sustaining financial model, which has hindered the clubs ability to compete in the transfer market, let alone contract negotiations, the model for which is corrupt to say the least. And who makes these decisions? The board! So I think I am safe to say that change is definitely necessary if we want to see Arsenal bringing home the trophies that we have long been waiting for. The board can protest that they are ambitious, but Peter Hill-Wood summed up the extent of that ambition when he said to the Guardian “it’s not as if we have been relegated.” No shit, Peter!

I hate Man City and Chelsea just as much as any of you, for the way they completely changed the face of British football and turned the game into the “survival of the richest” rather than the natural survival of the fittest. We are fit enough to win the league, without a doubt, but we do not have the financial muscle required.

Alisher Usmanov’s dark history has recently been revealed, and I have my doubts about him regardless of his history. First of all, he admitted he has only been an Arsenal fan for 7 years! Round of applause? I think not. Not only that, but were he to join the board, we would undoubtedly see our “ethical approach” to football deplete. There is no question that he would spend, on players, on wages, and on sponsorships – areas which we criticise other clubs for spending too heavily on. None of us want to see Arsenal buy the title, it is not our way, we want to earn it and deserve it.

However, we can wish and want all we like, but the facts remain. Football is changing, success is becoming dependant on investment – like it or not. If we do not adapt to change, we will begin to decline. The reality is that we do not have the strength and depth in the squad to see out a whole season, we do not have quality cover for injured players, and we do not have the option of rotation to maintain fitness of our key players. That being said – we are not far off. We managed third this season and showed serious signs of the spirit that our invincible team possessed. There is no question that Wenger has a way of inspiring the young players, and his position in my eyes is set in stone until he decides otherwise. Usmanov clearly stated in his letter to the board that he supports the manager:

As a consequence of this policy, which is dressed up as prudent financial planning, it is down to our manager, and not the shareholders, to have to deal with the Club’s tight finances, carry the burden of repaying the stadium debt by selling his best players and having to continue to find cheaper replacements. All of that, naturally, comes at the expense of performance on the pitch.

I believe that the current board’s reluctance to invest is costing Wenger his chance to become the greatest manager of all time. To be considered the best he knows he must win the Champions League and right now we are a long way from that, especially if we lose RVP. There are no signs coming from the club that an equivalent replacement will be purchased should RVP leave -just as there were not equivalent replacements for Fabregas and Nasri last season. Usmanov would not allow this. “We want the absolute best for the Club and will do what is necessary to ensure the success of the Club that we all love.” Whether you believe his statement or not, he would not have publically released the letter if he were not willing to follow up on his intentions should he get the opportunity to do so. The results of the AST survey show that 82% are in favour Red & White Holdings to be invited onto the board, compared to 70% in 2011. If you would like to read the AST 2012 Survey results then visit this link (http://arsenaltrust.org/resources/documents/1341846103ast-questionaire-2012-results-v5.pdf)

As fans we are all entitled to our own opinion. However, in summary I will say this. The current board are extremely disrespectful to Usmanov, not only are they refusing him a seat on the board of the club which he owns almost 30% of (Usmanov has a seat on Dynamo Moscow board but does not own any shares) but they do not even have the decent business etiquette to approach him regarding a sponsorship deal with MegaFon –a company which he owns 50% of. We can argue that he only sees Arsenal as a great business opportunity for himself, but I believe that is all the current board see in Arsenal – an opportunity to line their own pockets – and they do not bring us fans any success in doing so, which I think is the key difference between Kroenke and Usmanov – the desire to bring success to the club.

I leave you with this quote from Usmanov: “You can try and put a good face on a bad game for as long as you want, pontificating about the merits of this model, but it will not hide the obvious fact that it just does not allow our great manager to fully realise his managerial talent and deliver success for the fans who are paying the highest prices in the land.”

If you would like to have your say on this situation, I invite you to vote on my webpage:

www.fan-shout.com

Take it easy gooners.
SC

COMMENTS GUIDELINES: ANY COMMENTS WITH SWEARING OR PERSONAL ABUSE WILL BE DELETED WITHOUT EXCEPTION: PLEASE DISCUSS THE SUBJECT IN A FRIENDLY AND OBJECTIVE MANNER. SERIAL ABUSERS WILL BE BANNED. PLEASE BE NICE TO YOUR FELLOW GOONERS! NEW IDEA!! If A comment is deemed EXTRA SPECIAL I reserve the right to sopy it and use it as an article in its own right. (Edited of course!)


View the original article here

Arsenal Debate: The facts about Alisher Usmanov may make you change your mind…..

Criminal Billionaires Easily Manipulate the Media – by JG

This is going to be a long article, and in fact, it will be a “resource piece” where I am just paraphrasing an entire article from another site (www.liveleak.com), where they did the same because they are also trying to get the truth out about Alisher Usmanov’s history as a criminal businessman. Would I have liked to just talk about it myself and just post the link? Sure, but many of you wouldn’t bother clicking the link and would go straight to commenting, which would defeat the purpose. If you want to know why I (and loads of other true Arsenal fans) don’t want Usmanov sliding his fat face into a power position at the club, then read the “forwarded” article below (in it’s entirety).

~~ Craig Murray, former United Kingdom Ambassador to Uzbekistan, author of the book, Murder in Samarkand: A British Ambassador’s Controversial Defiance of Tyranny in the War on Terror, and contributor to Atlantic Free Press has recently had his personal blogging site – as well as a number of sites not owned by him and on the same server, taken down by his U.K. hosting company due to pressure from Schillings, a high-powered London Law firm, on behalf of Uzbeki Alisher Usmanov – the latest Russian billionaire to move to the United Kingdom. Usmanov’s lawyers have gone after the host of Murray’s site rather than Craig Murray himself. It seems they would prefer not to have Murray on the stand in a courtroom. Usmanov is allegedly livid – as it has been leaked that he was not a political prisoner at all, but rather a hard-nosed criminal.

We at Atlantic Free Press feel that bloggers, hosting companies and Internet publishers cannot operate if they are bullied by rich plaintiffs.

Defamation law in the United Kingdom, asinine as it is – needs reform. Mistakes on blogs can easily be sorted – particularly where they permit commenting which allows postings to be criticised, facts corrected, and arguments opposed. Rather than arm-twisting legal tactics.

However, Usmanov, the nouveau riche thug that he is, chose to throw money at his lawyers to shut down those who dare to legitimately criticise him and has now gotten his hands full and has been locked in the cyber jaws of what is known as the “Streisand Effect” and learned what the power of the Internet really is. THOUSANDS of blogger’s have rallied to support Craig and those who have been taken out by Usmanov’s high priced lawyers at Schillings (whose reputation, backed up on their website by the laughable case studies currently being mocked across the “blogosphere”, is now at stake). Too bad they did not do enough research nor care to notice that other well-known political figures were on the same servers as Craig and were also pulled – including prospective candidate for London mayor Boris Johnson. Now it’s now gone viral on the Net and is being picked up in the mainstream media.

Mr Eugenides sums it up:
If you can be silenced for calling a businessman a crook, then you can be silenced for calling a politician a crook, too. Then its everyones problem.

We have chosen to reprint Murray’s original post in full below and posted an earlier article on the subject

I thought I should make my views on Alisher Usmanov quite plain to you.

You are unlikely to see much plain talking on Usmanov elsewhere in the media because he has already used his billions and his lawyers in a pre-emptive strike. They have written to all major UK newspapers, including the latter:

Mr Usmanov was imprisoned for various offences under the old Soviet regime. We wish to make it clear our client did not commit any of the offences with which he was charged. He was fully pardoned after President Mikhail Gorbachev took office. All references to these matters have now been expunged from police records . . . Mr Usmanov does not have any criminal record.

Let me make it quite clear that Alisher Usmanov is a criminal.

He was in no sense a political prisoner, but a gangster and racketeer who rightly did six years in jail. The lawyers cunningly evoke “Gorbachev”, a name respected in the West, to make us think that justice prevailed. That is completely untrue. Usmanov’s pardon was nothing to do with Gorbachev. It was achieved through the growing autonomy of another thug, President Karimov, at first President of the Uzbek Soviet Socialist Republic and from 1991 President of Uzbekistan.

Karimov ordered the “Pardon” because of his alliance with Usmanov’s mentor, Uzbek mafia boss and major international heroin overlord Gafur Rakimov. Far from being on Gorbachev’s side, Karimov was one of the Politburo hardliners who had Gorbachev arrested in the attempted coup that was thwarted by Yeltsin standing on the tanks outside the White House.

Usmanov is just a criminal whose gangster connections with one of the World’s most corrupt regimes got him out of jail. He then plunged into the “privatisation” process at a time when gangster muscle was used to secure physical control of assets, and the alliance between the Russian Mafia and Russian security services was being formed. Usmanov has two key alliances. he is very close indeed to President Karimov, and especially to his daughter Gulnara. It was Usmanov who engineered the 2005 diplomatic reversal in which the United States was kicked out of its airbase in Uzbekistan and Gazprom took over the country’s natural gas assets. Usmanov, as chairman of Gazprom Investholdings paid a bribe of $88 million to Gulnara Karimova to secure this.

This is set out on page 366 of Murder in Samarkand. Alisher Usmanov had risen to chair of Gazprom Investholdings because of his close personal friendship with Putin, He had accessed Putin through Putin’s long time secretary and now chef de cabinet, Piotr Jastrzebski. Usmanov and Jastrzebski were roommates at college. Gazprom Investholdings is the group that handles Gazproms interests outside Russia, Usmanov’s role is, in effect, to handle Gazprom’s bribery and sleaze on the international arena, and the use of gas supply cuts as a threat to uncooperative satellite states.

Gazprom has also been the tool which Putin has used to attack internal democracy and close down the independent media in Russia. Gazprom has bought out with the owners having no choice the only independent national TV station and numerous rgional TV stations, several radio stations and two formerly independent national newspapers. These have been changed into slavish adulation of Putin. Usmanov helped accomplish this through Gazprom.

The major financial newspaper, Kommersant, he bought personally. He immediately replaced the editor-in-chief with a pro-Putin hack, and three months later the long-serving campaigning defence correspondent, Ivan Safronov, mysteriously fell to his death from a window. All this, both on Gazprom and the journalist’s death, is set out in great detail here. Usmanov is also dogged by the widespread belief in Uzbekistan that he was guilty of a particularly atrocious rape, which was covered up and the victim and others in the know disappeared. The sad thing is that this is not particularly remarkable.

Rape by the powerful is an everyday hazard in Uzbekistan, again as outlined in Murder in Samarkand page 120. If anyone has more detail on the specific case involving Usmanov please add a comment. I reported back in 2002 or 2003 in an Ambassadorial top secret telegram to the Foreign Office that Usmanov was the most likely favoured successor of President Karimov as totalitarian leader of Uzbekistan.

I also outlined the Gazprom deal (before it happened) and the present by Usmanov to Putin (though in Jastrzebski’s name) of half of Mapobank, a Russian commercial bank owned by Usmanov. I will never forget the priceless reply from our Embassy in Moscow. They said that they had never even heard of Alisher Usmanov, and that Jastrzebski was a jolly nice friend of the Ambassador who would never do anything crooked.

Sadly, I expect the football authorities will be as purblind. Football now is about nothing but money, and even Arsenal supporters as tight-knit and homespun a football community as any can be heard saying they don’t care where the money comes from as long as they can compete with Chelsea. I fear that is very wrong. Letting as diseased a figure as Alisher Usmanov into your club can only do harm in the long term. ~~

Extremely rich people who get caught for being involved in criminal and illegal dealings get “off the hook” all the time, because they pay certain people fat wads of cash to sway their decisions, it’s very rare in this day and age to see proven (billionaire) criminals convicted, because of the power they wield with money, unless other billionaires sell them out and have them take the fall. Alisher Usmanov payed his way out of jail because he knew the right people…a typical outcome for people like him.

If you took anything from the article, just read the last sentence “Letting as diseased a figure as Alisher Usmanov into your club can only do harm in the long term”. Key words IN THE LONG TERM! Sure, at first, it would be soooo amazing, “ooh we’re signing expensive players”, sparkly sparkly, distraction distraction. Really quick I would like to post a comment from the previous article that I felt deserved acclamation, here it is…

~from andy
Usmanov is a business man and a billionaire; yes he has money, he knows how to run a business structure which both are key ingredients for our club but yet you say he’s a “true Arsenal fan”. Let me tell you this, he’s no more an Arsenal fan than I am. To me, he see’s us as a business opportunity. Based just on that I hardly think he’d stop chasing. When we are in our deepest troubles, he releases a perfectly written open letter that speaks the hearts of frustration that the Arsenal supporters has been in burden for some time, what a coincidence! The timing is perfect to rub salt on old wound. It’s all professionaly prepared and planned, unlike RVP’s tweeter. In the meantime, he could be running and setting up a website dedicated to run a poll for people to vote for Usmanov ‘in’ or ‘out’ using his profit he just made from selling one of his houses. He could even hire journalists or use his empire of wealth, influence and business connections to his advantage. (Usmanov manipulating the media, brilliant from andy)

You see, I want my beloved club to be set in stone for all eternity, not to shine brightly for a while and then pop like a balloon and deflate. In the last article, people made me out as somebody who likes the current board at Arsenal…BAH! I laugh in their faces. I don’t really like the board at Arsenal all that much because they are just a bit too cautious at times about spending in the transfer window, which don’t get me wrong, is a good thing because they are making sure the club can afford the annual payments for the stadium, but they get a bit carried away sometimes. This doesn’t mean though, that we should be in favor of trading the current board (the lesser of two evils) for Usmanov.

Now, I know this article is ridiculously long and I apologise for that, but this is important. You lot, who don’t give a sh!t where the money comes from, you just want that “money money money”, need to understand that you are selling out the soul of Arsenal (a beacon of proper business ethics, morals, and beautiful football) for the love of money. That’s the bottom line, you’re willing to sell the morals, dignity and ethics that our club stands for, for a fat Russian thugs money. Take a good look in the mirror, do you see a gunner wearing the red and white? Or a pig with a giant £ stamped on it’s chest…

I’d like to end this article with a picture that speaks volumes about how true Arsenal fans (who actually go to the games) feel about Usmanov. They are most likely educated/ well informed people who understand how corrupted the “billionaire” world is, and don’t want Usmanov corrupting and soiling Arsenal FC.

Be patient fellow gooners, our club is not faltering, keep the faith, protect the Arsenal code, silverware is on the way.

P.S – touche on the “love of money is the root of all evil” quote from the last article, I did get that wrong…lol

ARSENAL FOR LIFE

by JG

COMMENTS GUIDELINES: ANY COMMENTS WITH SWEARING OR PERSONAL ABUSE WILL BE DELETED WITHOUT EXCEPTION: PLEASE DISCUSS THE SUBJECT IN A FRIENDLY AND OBJECTIVE MANNER. SERIAL ABUSERS WILL BE BANNED. PLEASE BE NICE TO YOUR FELLOW GOONERS! NEW IDEA!! If A comment is deemed EXTRA SPECIAL I reserve the right to sopy it and use it as an article in its own right. (Edited of course!)


View the original article here

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Arsenal DON’T need Alisher Usmanov. Here is why……..

Do Arsenal Fans Want A Sugar Daddy Too? - by JG


A truly disappointing wave of supporters, lie in wait of bad news, then rush the blogs in angry (misinformed) discontent and veracious temperaments, bursting their brains over circumstantial evidence and emotional overflow.


“We want a sugar daddy! We want a sugar daddy! Yes Yes Yes!” This can easily be translated to “We want to be more like Chelsea and Man City! We want to be more like Chelsea and Man City!”


As the old saying goes “Money is the root of all evil” and it’s one of the best old sayings around, because in this day and age, it’s validity can be seen on a daily maybe even hourly basis.


Usmanov is a billionaire menace, a man who wants a “play thing”. That is what billionaires like doing; they enjoy buying sports teams and then “playing with them” like regular people do with fantasy football. Then, when play time is over, the club is left with bills that they cannot afford and suffer due to crippling and destructive amounts of debt.


Football players wages have skyrocketed into the realm of absurdity! It’s almost criminal how much money is involved in the “beautiful game”, and it is causing rifts throughout the footballing community. I keep hearing people drone on about “Times are Changing”, well they are changing for the worse if more and more people start thinking “all problems can be fixed by just throwing money at them”.


Arsenal is it’s own brand of football (in marketing terms); and what, some fans want to ruin that code of ethics that the club stands for, just to jump on the “sugar daddy” bandwagon? I will be blunt…PISS OFF!!! Arsenal are doing just fine without selling their soul to the god most people worship which is MONEY.


Now, before you naysayers start going on about “Arsenal are doing fine? No trophies in 7 seasons!” spoiled children act, let me remind you of what I proved (WITH FACTUAL EVIDENCE) in an article I previously posted. I proved to you that there is a connection between Arsenal managment’s frugal mentality and the building of the Emirates (which most of you have completely forgotten so I’ll have to explain it again)


Since the stadium was built Arsenal are required to pay (according to AW himself) just over 15 million pounds annually for the “mortgage” on the stadium. Include that with just the normal bills the club have to deal with i.e. keeping the pitch in pristine condition, the Emirates grounds, players wages, management’s wages, coaches wages, scouting expenses, marketing and much much more…having that extra 15 million is quite a hefty chunk of change to have to fork out every year; and before you say “Usmanov can pay off the stadium debt”, that is not possible, because Arsenal are required by contract to pay off the mortgage in increments, no more, no less.


Bottom line is, the stadium was built to solidify our amazing club for all time, but the sacrifice that had to be made was cuts to player wages, and cuts in transfer fee funds, and probably cuts in other departments. Did that mean we had to sign a few average players along the way? Or take chances on players who “might” develop into stars but didn’t? Yeah it did, and we all know their names; but even with those sacrifices, we have been able to stay in the Champions League for every single season, and still enjoy some of the best football in the world. So if you aren’t satisfied with what the club has been able to pull off, considering the circumstances, then I will be blunt again…PISS OFF you spoiled little children.


Financial Fair Play is not going to be “a joke”, like some foolish fans are claiming and if you want to actually know something about it before running your mouth then here is the link. Go and read up on it because there is a lot more at stake than a few measly fines. Also, with FFP coming into play, there would be no use for a filthy billionaire like Usmanov anyway because of the rules in the FFP policy. Again, if you want to talk about it, maybe you should read the actual documents…


Arsenal are going to benefit from the FFP basically because it’s like Arsenal have been operating under the FFP for the last decade; and because all of our competitors i.e. the mancs, chelski, citeh, barca, madrid; they are all swimming in debt and will eventually sink, they fear the FFP policy. The only other club I can think of who actually are responsible with their finances (and are on the same level as us) are Bayern Munich; and in the following years to come, I can see them becoming our (EURO) rivals. At the moment they only have the upper hand because they don’t have a brand new stadium to pay off.


Overall, I hate to sound unruly and dictatorial, but it’s getting ridiculous! All the fans that only come out of the woodwork just to slander, be negative and ooze out filthy and preposterous conspiracy theories about the club are pathetic and an insult to all the loyal “through thick and thin” fans out there who believe in the Arsenal Code of Ethics and Dignity. They are nowhere to be seen when the club is doing well, but when the team suffers, they start berating the manager, the players and anyone else they can think of. They smear the moneygrubbing (not to be mentioned) players that leave the club for financial gain, yet they demand that Arsenal be more like the despicable clubs that lured those said players away. All I can say is…what a sad state to get in, and hopefully they grow up.


I love Arsenal…and I want the club to remain perched above all the filthy money clubs, on it’s pedestal of dignity and ethics. Not to SELL OUT and become like our rivals. Be patient fellow fans…the stadium will be completely paid off in a few years time and Arsenal will become an even greater powerhouse than it is now, while all the other clubs are fumbling about trying to get their books in order. Things are already starting to look up with most of the undesirable players making their exits and top players like Podolski and Giroud being brought in. Good times are ahead, but until then, try not to lose your head.


ARSENAL FOR LIFE


View the original article here

Monday, July 9, 2012

Arsenal News: Usmanov criticises board in open letter [Letter in full]

The recent open letter by captain and talisman Robin van Persie has prompted Arsenal’s second largest shareholder Alisher Usmanov to take advantage of the situation and release his own open letter criticising the board.

There has been much deliberation over both Kroenke and Usmanov by Arsenal fans and it seems the tug-of-war between the two seems to be getting more and more intense.

Dear Sirs,

In recent weeks a couple of separate actions have occurred, which have caused us, as a near 30% shareholder in the Club, to have serious concerns about the approach of the Board and the management team:

Firstly, there were some very deliberate and public comments by Ivan Gazidis which were intended to leave the Club’s supporters with an impression that Red & White is in some bitter stand-off with the Board over its desire for a Board seat and that our involvement on the Club’s Board might cause conflict and “destabilize” the Club; andSecondly, OJSC MegaFon (Russia) received a cold call letter from Mr Gazidis requesting a meeting to discuss a possible international partnership deal including shirt sponsorship. MegaFon is one of the three largest mobile phone companies in Russia and also happens to be over 50% owned by Alisher Usmanov. Is this really the level of professionalism that is being applied to securing long-term commercial contracts?

Let us not forget that we have invested circa £200 million of cash in the equity of the Club. We are part of this Club and naturally want the best for it, but our investment is less important than the fact that we are loyal supporters and will never do anything that would destabilize or “create conflict” at the Club.

We do however believe that you, the Board, and the executive management team should focus your energies on the most efficient operation of the Club and desist from seeking to create a false enemy in Red & White. In our view it is clear that you are trying to distract attention from the more fundamental issues facing the Club, and which indeed many of the supporters discuss through social media sites and other forums on a regular basis. These are the financial model, the lack of investment and the Club’s future strategic direction.

However, before addressing these points, it is important to deal with the issues surrounding a Board seat for Red & White once and for all. As you all know well, Mr Usmanov has never sought for himself a Board seat at the Club. Indeed Mr Usmanov does not hold any board seat in any of the companies where he is an investor. Since the purchase of our first share in the Club, we have not only steadfastly adhered to a policy of non-interference in the running of the Club, but have consistently supported the management and given no reason whatsoever to be accused of subversion or sabotage. The history of our voting in support of the Board at the annual general meetings is proof of this.

Indeed, in any conversation about conflict, it is clear from a look at the history of the Club in recent years that the Board has achieved conflict without the help of any outside parties, notably the acrimonious departures of David Dein, Keith Edelman, Lady Nina Bracewell-Smith and Richard Carr, who then reappeared on the Football Club Board. You also instituted a lock-down agreement originally to prevent Mr Kroenke from gaining control and then, later, to exclude our involvement even though there were no grounds or need to do so.

The real conflict seems to be between the supporters’ expectations and your vision for the Club and at the heart of this is the policy of so-called self-financing. The self-financing model was created to suit the major shareholders at the time, all of whom subsequently sold their shares.

The previous decision by the Board to fund the building of the Emirates Stadium with long-term debt was, we believe, certainly not about self-financing. If it had been, it would have been funded through a mixture of debt and non-dividend equity. Instead it allowed, in our view, the major shareholders of the time, who happened to all be Board directors, to load the Club with a liability, to benefit from increased future revenue streams and consequent increase in the value of their holdings, whilst avoiding dilution of their equity. The Board of the time then appeared to pursue a policy of increasing ticket prices and squeezing the fans to cover the short term cost increases which allowed them to bridge until all of these shareholders and Board directors sold 100% of their holdings and cashed out at vast profits.

This policy does not seem to have changed. We have sought and been refused any meetings with Mr Kroenke despite the fact that we own almost 30% of the Club or to put another way almost 1 in every 3 seats in the stadium. It is clear that our stated policy for the major shareholders, namely Mr Kroenke and ourselves, to inject non-dividend paying equity into the Club by way of a rights issue to reduce the debt and invest in the future is of no interest to the Board. Mr Kroenke was sold a vision by the Board at the time that the Club could be successful without further investment, so he is pursuing a similar policy which is to run the Club without any investment and to avoid any dilution of his equity, a good part of which was funded by a loan from Deutsche Bank AG to KSE, UK, Inc. at the time of the mandatory offer. The status of that loan and whether it is still outstanding has not been clarified by Mr Kroenke.

As a consequence of this policy, which is dressed up as prudent financial planning, it is down to our manager, and not the shareholders, to have to deal with the Club’s tight finances, carry the burden of repaying the stadium debt by selling his best players and having to continue to find cheaper replacements. All of that, naturally, comes at the expense of performance on the pitch.

This policy is leading to the loss of our best players, often to our main competitors, and even causes the players themselves to question their future at the Club and the Club’s ambitions. The situation with our captain and outstanding performer from last season Robin van Persie sums this up. Yet again we are faced with losing our true marquee player at the Club because we cannot assure him of the future direction and give confidence that we can win trophies. Where are the safeguards to ensure that this doesn’t happen again and again in the future? As a top Club we should, at the very least, match if not beat the offers that other clubs make to try and lure our very best players away, and also provide a more compelling vision of the future. You can try and put a good face on a bad game for as long as you want, pontificating about the merits of this model, but it will not hide the obvious fact that it just does not allow our great manager to fully realize his managerial talent and deliver success for the fans who are paying the highest prices in the land. It appears that a place in the Champions League will be the pinnacle of our ambition again next season. Unfortunately, in the future we may see this ambition lowered further. It doesn’t help to turn a blind eye to the reality of the situation and keep thinking of ourselves as being in the same league as Real Madrid, Chelsea, Manchester City and Barcelona. To have a fighting chance of success, which means winning trophies, we need to match them in every aspect, including, if not first and foremost, financial.

So what is Red & White’s vision for the Club? It is simple. A debt free Club, with a big enough war chest to buy top talent players who can hit the ground running and who can complement the Club’s long tradition of developing young players and homegrown talent. Together they can help the Club win the most prestigious trophies – because it is the trophies which are the crowning achievement for everybody at the Club. The trophies are also key to the commercial success of the Club – they increase the value of the players, the value of the brand, attract the best sponsors and maximize the value of our commercial contracts which should in turn mean that the Club does not have to squeeze any more income from hard pressed fans. We also believe in the transparency that a stock market listing brings so are committed to the Club remaining listed on the stock exchange and to greater fan involvement both through share ownership and also Board representation for the fans.

Today we wish the majority shareholder Mr Kroenke every success in running the Club, even though we have deep reservations about the viability of the policies being pursued by his management team and sanctioned by the Board.

Finally and reflecting our long-term commitment to the Club, we will continue to purchase more shares in the Club from anyone who wants to sell them to us. Also in order to formalize our long-term involvement with the Club and put an end to any speculation over our position, we, as the co-owners of Red &White, will proudly retain our holding in the Club as a long-term investment for ourselves and our family members to benefit for generations to come. We want the absolute best for the Club and will do what is necessary to ensure the success of the Club that we all love.

Yours sincerely,

Alisher Usmanov

Farhad Moshiri

Personally speaking, it is pretty clear here that Usmanov is taking advantage of fans who are obviously feeling anger towards the situation surrounding Robin van Persie. Glorifying Wenger, criticizing the board and promising significant funds are all initiatives that would appease a majority of Arsenal fans.

The debate over Usmanov has been hotly contested by Arsenal fans with many suggesting that we have come to far under our current model to simply throw it all away and become the next Chelsea or Manchester City run by some suger-daddy with supposed ‘bad intentions’.

On the other side of the coin however, surely it is not a coincidence that since Kroenke took over Arsenal has been falling apart every transfer window, losing marquee players and merely replacing them with cheaper alternatives. Something must be done to stop this.

What do you guys think? Is it a story of suger-daddies versue leeches? If so who would you prefer? Have any more information to add? Is Wenger the Dark Knight in all of this? Feel free to leave a comment below!


View the original article here

Sunday, July 8, 2012

Robin van Persie's decision not to renew contract gives Alisher Usmanov opportunity to attack Arsenal board

In a wide-ranging and scathing five-page letter, Usmanov accused Arsenal's board, which is led by majority shareholder Stan Kroenke, of selling the club’s best players and replacing them with cheaper alternatives. He also expressed his “deep reservations” about their policies, which he claimed were causing players to question their futures and the club’s ambitions.

The timing of the letter, less than 24 hours after Van Persie’s announcement that he would not sign a new contract, could hardly have been worse for Arsenal. The club, however, maintain that they are fully committed to a self-funding approach which, they argue, will secure both their long-term future and ultimately also offer the best chance of success.

This view is evidently not shared by Usmanov or Van Persie, who admitted publicly on Wednesday that he disagreed with Arsène Wenger and chief executive Ivan Gazidis “on many aspects” of how the club should move forward.

Wenger will now seek urgent talks with Van Persie to determine whether the situation is retrievable. Arsenal’s official stance is that they are “confident” Van Persie will see out a contract which does not expire until next year but his release of such a provocative statement, without warning, clearly makes this very difficult.

Although no club can match Manchester City’s financial firepower, it is understood that Van Persie is also attracted by interest from both Juventus and Manchester United. There is pressure to resolve the situation quickly, with Van Persie scheduled to lead Arsenal on their pre-season tour of Asia, beginning on July 21.

Arsenal have already spent £24million this summer on signing two new strikers in Lukas Podolski and Olivier Giroud but Wenger will meet his scouts next week to determine his other priorities. Fiorentina captain Stevan Jovetic and Poland forward Robert Lewandowski are among the players being monitored.

Usmanov, who owns just under 30 per cent of Arsenal, made it clear that he regards the debt from building the Emirates as the root cause of the club’s recent failure to win trophies and keep key players happy.

With his business partner Farhad Moshiri, he has long called for a rights issue that would release share equity to pay off a debt that peaked at £318million in 2008 but now costs the club around £14?million a year. That would require an extra financial commitment from existing shareholders, primarily Kroenke and Usmanov, although would probably also place penalty bank charges on the club for the early loan repayment.

“It is down to our manager and not the shareholders to have to deal with the club’s tight finances, carry the burden of repaying the stadium debt by selling his best players and having to continue to find cheaper replacements,” said Usmanov.

“This policy is leading to the loss of our best players, often to our main competitors, and even causes the players themselves to question their future at the club and the club’s ambitions. The situation with our captain and outstanding performer from last season, Robin van Persie, sums this up.

“Yet again we are faced with losing our true marquee player because we cannot assure him of the future direction and give confidence that we can win trophies.”

As well as Van Persie, Theo Walcott is now into the final year of his contract and is the subject of interest from both Chelsea and Paris St-Germain.

“You can try and put a good face on a bad game for as long as you want, pontificating about the merits of this model, but it will not hide the obvious fact that it just does not allow our great manager [Wenger] to fully realise his managerial talent and deliver success for the fans who are paying the highest prices in the land,” said Usmanov.

He also claimed that securing a place in the Champions League “will be the pinnacle of our ambition again next season” and warned that, in the future, “we may see this ambition lowered further”.


View the original article here

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Usmanov using Arsenal stake for greater role in Kroenke regime

Alisher Usmanov is not interested in selling his Arsenal stake to Stan Kroenke, it has been revealed.

The London Evening Standard says Usmanov is keen to seek greater influence in the running of the club and will use his share as a holding stake.

There is no indication at this stage that Usmanov will try to mount a rival takeover, having had a late bid for Lady Nina Bracewell-Smith's 15.9 per cent share rebuffed despite offering £12million more than Kroenke.

It is not yet clear exactly what influence Usmanov is seeking. The billionaire's stake is sufficient to block any major capital restructuring at the club which is not in his interest. However, he will not be able to block any transfers, contract negotiations, commercial ventures or general day-to-day business decisions.

Click here for the No1 coverage of all the gossip and transfer news around Arsenal.


View the original article here

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...